What's new. New posts New profile posts Latest activity. Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts Billboard Trophies. Is the ik still worth buying? Thread starter zmcdog Start date Apr 8, Forums Hardware CPUs. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Previous Next Sort by votes. Apr 8, 8 0 10 0. I have a few spare components that I plan on doing a system build with, but I am missing a motherboard and a cpu.
Also cooler and motherboard suggestions are welcome. Thanks for the help guys! Mar 14, 15, , 5, Mar 21, 7, 43 28, I can vouch for that I went from a k to an k and I did see framerate gains but nothing astonishing.
Jul 1, 0 18, 0. I've had the i7 k since and not even thinking about upgrading it anytime soon. I overclocked it last year to 4. If you can get it at a good price it is definatley worth it imo, like someone else mentioned the hard part will be getting a motherboard for it a snot many Z77 about on ebay.
Yuka Splendid. May 3, 7, 26, I'm an i7 K user that has had it since running at 4. For this review, we dusted off our box of old CPUs and put it in for a run through our benchmarks, both at stock and overclocked, to see if it is still a mainstream champion. The Core i7 Family Photo. If you want to see all of our Core i7 benchmarks for each one of these CPUs, head over to anandtech.
Sit in a chair, lie back, and dream of It's a year when you looked at that old Core 2 Duo rig, or Athlon II system, and it was time for an upgrade. You had seen that Nehalem, and that the Core i was a handy overclocker and kicking some butt. It was a pleasant time, until Intel went and gave the industry a truly disruptive product whose nostalgia still rings with us today.
That product was Sandy Bridge. AnandTech scored the exclusive on the review, and the results were almost impossible to believe, for many reasons. In our results at the time, it was by far and above a leap ahead of anything else we had seen, especially given the thermal monstrosities that Pentium 4 had produced several years previous. Intel managed to stand on the shoulders of its previous best product and score a Grand Slam. In that core design, Intel shook things up considerably. One key proponent was the micro-op cache, which means that recently decoded instructions that are needed again are taken already decoded, rather than wasting power being decoded again.
Its results are measured in kilobytes per second. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor. Cinebench Release A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version. Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation.
There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Cryptocurrency mining performance of Core iK and Core iK. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Let's see how good Core iK and Core iK are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core iK and Core iK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. Here you can ask a question about Core iK or Core iK, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Intel Core iK vs Core iK. Moving to PCIe 3. The results from our testing paint an interesting picture, and as a result so do our conclusions.
Our CPU testing was quite clear — in almost every test, the overclock on the K was only able to half the deficit between the K and the K when both were run at stock. The only benchmarks that differed were the benchmarks that were AVX2 capable, where the K had a massive lead due to the fact that it supports AVX2. The GPU testing had a different result. From to , enthusiast gamers have moved from p in one of two directions: higher resolutions or higher framerates.
The direction moved depends on the type of game played, and modern game engines are geared up to cater for both, and have been optimized for the latest hardware with the latest APIs. For users going up in resolution, to 4K and beyond, the iK when overclocked performs just as well as the latest Core iK. The stock K is a little behind, but not overly noticeable unless you drill down into specific titles.
For users staying at p or p but looking at high frame rates to drive higher refresh rate displays, there is more of a tangible benefit here.
0コメント