I just loathe IE and Chrome and so the —fox family has gotten the nod by default. My biggest complaint about Firefox and Cyberfox is that I can start the browser, have only one tab with a webpage open on the browser for example. The memory usage will be around x amount, at that initial point. I was actually ready to give Opera a try, seeing how I liked it on my phone. But apparently they stopped x64 development or something. Was the browser tested? Just curious to see how it stacked up.
Yes there was a stop gap, called PAE, but it of course needed hardware. Your paranoia almost makes me ashamed to be an sound tech, among other things.
After waiting for months I updated the latest Chrome stable version 50 to 64 bit. I run the latest Windows 10 x64 Home. No disadvantages noted so far. Seems the programmers are making use of the extra memory when coding 64 bit browsers and I guess that might justify some of the additional memory usage. My solution is to just add more memory to my system so I can accommodate it. If 64 bit is more secure, it just seems logical to increase the hardware standards.
I mean, PCs have long been capable of handling 32GB or more of memory for several years and unless you are really dealing with a cheaper architecture with memory limitations, why not just upgrade the memory.
All of these thoughts are probably trivial and not even encouraging suggestions but just idea how to succumb to available memory being absorbed via browsing on a 64 bit platform with extensions. So many are being told 8GB is more than plenty for a home system or gaming unit and so many people trying to push that B.
You think people are running one thing at a time or something? Some people know how to do more than walk and chew gum at the same time so I think people who have been underestimating how much memory some people actually need are just a bunch of clueless wanna be technicians. I know better. I am one who can speed through 5 different browsers running multiple windows in excess of 50 tabs in each and do not tell me it cannot be done fast enough to strain an 8 core running 16GB because I am constantly hitting choppy movement from how demanding my requirements are at times.
Just felt like saying it. I would like to see more browsers tested this way too. Next, try running a system using 32GB memory and see where that takes things on the 64bit platform. I have no doubt the chrome variants of browsers are memory hogs in general and I never cared for how they managed memory.
I hate Google Chrome but I do like Vivaldi as it seems to be able to run alot of my extensions more fluently in both 32 and 64bit version. This article and test is just right up my alley when it comes to finding the cure for alot of my browsing heartaches.
I am not some knowledgeable programmer or anything like that. I do have some programming experience but I find being a very demanding user who spends every day pushing browsers to their maximum to get to the core of what makes them function the best. I just have negatives in all of them that I wish I could find a way to improve them. Especially with people mult-tasking and becoming even more capable of pushing computers beyond their limits. I only use one window or tab at a time. So why have it still loaded?
Makes no sense. Slow down and enjoy the world before you burn out. And no, I see no reason to use the computer for anything more than email and a few occasional links, like the one to this page. Why do people at home seem to need to be programmers or whatever? No reason for it. Look forward to it—you WILL have to slow down and just do one thing at a time, then. Out of curiosity ran jet stream Palemoon Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Please click on the following link to open the newsletter signup page: Ghacks Newsletter Sign up. Ghacks is a technology news blog that was founded in by Martin Brinkmann.
It has since then become one of the most popular tech news sites on the Internet with five authors and regular contributions from freelance writers. Search for:. A detailed comparison of the performance and RAM use of bit and bit web browsers running on a Windows machine. Martin Brinkmann. Surfshark VPN Review: good performance, good options. Free Download Manager removes support for YouTube downloads. Brave Search is now the default search engine for new users in 5 regions in Brave Browser.
Comments Nebulus said on January 3, at pm. Ugh said on April 17, at am. Jonah D. Anes said on October 18, at pm. Dwight Stegall said on January 3, at pm. I only use bit browsers. They are faster and more stable on my ASUS computers. Solidstate said on January 3, at pm. Nebulus said on January 3, at pm. Haakon said on January 3, at pm.
Well, you know what your system and data are worth. Tom said on January 3, at pm. Nay said on January 3, at pm. Surprising result!
Maou said on January 3, at pm. Here are my tests with Cyberfox, using processor optimized editions. Jordan said on January 20, at am. Jonny said on January 3, at pm. Boris said on January 3, at pm. A different Martin said on January 5, at pm. How much less? You can still manually install bit Firefox, if you choose. If you need to run bit Firefox or manually install bit Firefox, you can simply download and re-run the Windows bit or bit Firefox installer from the Firefox platforms and languages download page.
Download Firefox Firefox Privacy Notice. Get Mozilla VPN. Firefox for Android Get the customizable mobile browser for Android smartphones. Firefox Focus Simply private mobile browsing. Privacy Promise Learn how Firefox treats your data with respect. Is it faster? If you just load it on your computer and start working with it, it might seem faster.
But how can you really be sure unless you have solid numbers from Chrome bit to back it up? That's why we've done some testing. Testing was performed on Chrome bit on a laptop running Windows 8. Then Chrome bit was uninstalled and Chrome bit installed on the same laptop. Then the same tests were run. Everything else on the laptop stayed the same, so it was a static environment. Let's look at the numbers.
Both versions of Chrome were loaded and unloaded 10 times at ms intervals. Initially, Chrome bit loaded faster than Chrome 32, but in the end Chrome bit seemed to really slow down. Let's take a look at how the two versions use system resources. The MakeUseOf.
Chrome bit required just a little more than half The difference in CPU usage was negligible. This should not be surprising and is no need for concern.
Most bit Windows computers will have more than enough RAM to cover the difference. Peacekeeper , FutureMark's JavaScript engine testing tool, was first used to test the two versions of Chrome. Look to the right of the version number. To upgrade, head to the Chrome download page, download the bit version for Windows, and install it. Mozilla released a bit version of Firefox at the end of You may still be running the bit version. Microsoft provides both bit and bit versions of Internet Explorer on bit versions of Windows.
Windows made the bit Internet Explorer the default so that people would run into fewer problems. It offers greater speed and security. The new Brave browser blocks ads and trackers that slow you down and invade your privacy.
Discover a new way of thinking about how the web can work. New features are typically introduced in the Nightly channel. Brave is available as a fast, free, secure web browser for your mobile devices.
Complete with a built-in ad blocker that prevents tracking and provides security protection with optimized data and battery performance. Using a bit browser can offer significant performance benefits, according to some benchmarks. If you want to run bit Firefox on Windows, your choices are an official-but-unstable nightly build or a stable-but-unofficial Waterfox.
Waterfox is a bit build of Firefox for Windows. Unlike the nightly version from Mozilla, Waterfox is based on the stable releases of Firefox. It even uses the same profile Firefox does.
No other Web browser installs a bit version by default yet. You can still pin the bit version to your taskbar or add its shortcut to your desktop, though. If you want to set bit IE as your default program for certain file types — say,. Sorry, Chrome fans — Google Chrome only has a bit version for Linux. According to the Chromium project website, neither Chrome nor Chromium can currently be built for bit Windows.
But it appears that no one has done the work yet. Opera is now releasing bit development snapshots for Windows. These will likely be unstable, so using them as your default browser is a bad idea.
Opera advertises out-of-process plug-ins as a new feature that will allow bit versions of Opera to run bit plug-ins. Plug-in compatibility has always been the big problem with bit browsers. In the past, bit browsers have lacked Flash and other popular plug-ins. These days, the most popular plug-ins — Flash and Java — now have bit versions. You may not already have them installed, though. It includes a bit version for your bit browsers. If you use Java, you can download a bit build of Java from the manual download page.
Do you use a bit browser? If so, do you see a speed difference? Share your experiences in the comments. If that last sentence sent you scrambling for a tech glossary, put your mind at ease.
0コメント